Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Published nanopub chain — URI registry

LifeWatch ERIC

This file is the canonical registry of published nanopub URIs for this replication.

Claim tested: the 87.9 % validation accuracy of the natural-regeneration random forest of Williams et al. (2024), Williams et al. (2024), in Colombia. Outcome: partially supported (CiTO qualifies). Software Fouilloux (2026); derived data Fouilloux (2026); protocol from The Unjournal’s evaluation 1 et al. (2025).

Browse the chain: Outcome on Science Live.

Chain

StepTemplateURIPublished
01Quote-with-commentRAIzfxXAB5b95Wr0YNsqBDC2dXuYLjwSpnePtLMsoKghk2026-10-04
02AIDA SentenceRAfHVsFUNrF_mi-dJbHw5yLbW8O6HLvNZiWdWJC0aGQW82026-10-04
03FORRT ClaimRAit-NB6vnC7Fy4qSCK6H355AVXNgvkRLXftyHrATqm282026-10-04
04FORRT Replication StudyRAvmNqVLbETOORSoWE1WnelnJNtO0S97Z-16omQ65fhyg2026-10-04
05FORRT Replication OutcomeRAZF-V9BsAmgy5a0KezH74Fd78oZy2CS6PLsizcXMTNWg2026-10-04
06CiTO CitationRALLcB3xiCXR0UGSr7Irgo1hMohZthtGp0aCVf5qBpgoQ2026-10-04

Optional layers

StepTemplateURIPublished
07Research Software (if applicable)not applicable / not yet published
08Research Synthesis (if applicable)not applicable / not yet published

Format

URIs from Science Live are of the form https://w3id.org/sciencelive/np/RA…. URIs from Nanodash (used as a fallback when the Science Live UI hits a bug) are of the form https://w3id.org/np/RA…. Both are valid and citable.

If a URI is not in the Science Live namespace, view it via the Science Live viewer by wrapping the URI:

https://platform.sciencelive4all.org/np/?uri=<full-URI>

Cross-references

References
  1. Williams, B. A., Beyer, H. L., Fagan, M. E., Chazdon, R. L., Schmoeller, M., Sprenkle-Hyppolite, S., Griscom, B. W., Watson, J. E. M., Tedesco, A. M., Gonzalez-Roglich, M., Daldegan, G. A., Bodin, B., Celentano, D., Wilson, S. J., Rhodes, J. R., Alexandre, N. S., Kim, D.-H., Bastos, D., & Crouzeilles, R. (2024). Global potential for natural regeneration in deforested tropical regions. Nature, 636(8041), 131–137. 10.1038/s41586-024-08106-4
  2. Fouilloux, A. (2026). natural-regeneration-replication: testing the 87.9 % accuracy claim of Williams et al. (2024) in Colombia. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.23139192
  3. Fouilloux, A. (2026). Natural-regeneration potential in Colombia on HEALPix (WGS84): Williams et al. (2024) map, an independent replication model, and regrowth labels. Zenodo. 10.5281/ZENODO.23138775
  4. 1, E., 2, E., Reinstein, D., & Pacchiardi, L. (2025). Evaluation Summary and Metrics: “Global potential for natural regeneration in deforested tropical regions.” PubPub. 10.21428/d28e8e57.5411b150