Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

SST Gap-Filling: Sphere vs WGS84 Ellipsoid on HEALPix

Authors
Affiliations
LifeWatch ERIC
CNRS / APC

SST Gap-Filling: Does the WGS84 Ellipsoid Improve Results?

This project investigates whether accounting for the WGS84 ellipsoid geometry when resampling sea-surface temperature (SST) data to HEALPix improves the accuracy of gap-filling with scattering-transform synthesis (FOSCAT).

Motivation

Standard HEALPix assumes the Earth is a perfect sphere. In reality, the Earth is an oblate ellipsoid (equatorial radius ~21 km larger than polar). The healpix-geo and healpix-resample packages extend HEALPix to the WGS84 ellipsoid.

For CMB analysis on the celestial sphere, the spherical assumption is exact. For Earth-observation data like SST, the mismatch between sphere and ellipsoid could introduce systematic biases in HEALPix cell areas and neighbour relationships, potentially degrading gap-filling quality.

Experiment

We compare FOSCAT gap-filling RMSE (vs Copernicus Marine L4 reference) using:

  1. Sphere -- standard HEALPix pixelisation

  2. WGS84 -- HEALPix on the WGS84 ellipsoid

See the full analysis in SST Gap-Filling: Does the WGS84 Ellipsoid Improve Results?.

FORRT nanopublication chain

The full provenance of this question-rooted study is recorded as a six-step FORRT nanopublication chain on the Science Live platform — research question → declarative answer → FORRT claim → study → outcome → CiTO citations. Each step is independently citable and machine-readable.

Headline assertion — machine-readable: This work cito:extends chain #3 (fiesta-scattering-sst), cito:usesMethodIn Delouis et al. 2022, AND cito:credits the IGARSS 2024 Pangeo tutorial

Three relationships in one citation nanopublication: extends the sphere-only baseline at chain #3 to operational resolution with the sphere-vs-WGS84 comparison; uses the FOSCAT scattering method from Delouis 2022; credits Jean-Marc Delouis’s IGARSS 2024 Pangeo tutorial as the SST workflow source.

The five preceding nanopubs build the provenance ladder up to that citation:

References

References
  1. Delouis, J.-M., Allys, E., Gauvrit, E., & Boulanger, F. (2022). Non-Gaussian modelling and statistical denoising of Planck dust polarisation full-sky maps using scattering transforms. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 668, A122. 10.1051/0004-6361/202244566